Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs
Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs
  • 3 442
  • 7 573 607
Unlocking Cooperation: Climate Change and Human Mobility
On World Refugee Day, Carnegie Council hosted a critical discussion on enhancing multilateral cooperation at the intersection of climate change and human mobility, the second event in the Council’s “Unlocking Cooperation” series.
As extreme weather events and rising sea levels increasingly threaten coastal and island populations, particularly Small Island Developing States (SIDS), the panel will explore the urgent need for innovative and inclusive policies, guided by ethical considerations, to address climate-induced displacement and migration.
The discussion featured Ambassador Ali Naseer Mohamed, permanent representative of the Republic of Maldives to the UN, alongside experts from the International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the New York Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The conversation was moderated by University for Peace's Ramu Damodaran.
For more, please go to: carnegiecouncil.co/climate-change-mobility
#ethics #internationalaffairs #migration #climatechange #refugees
Переглядів: 32

Відео

The Doorstep: How the World Ran Out of Everything, with Peter S. Goodman
Переглядів 273День тому
After four years of showcasing how global news impacts your daily life, The Doorstep podcast is signing off for the final time. For its last episode, co-hosts Tatiana Serafin and Nikolas Gvosdev were joined by "New York Times" reporter Peter Goodman to discuss his new book "How the World Ran Out of Everything" and how geopolitics is connected to the goods that literally end up on our doorstep. ...
The Doorstep: U.S. Election 2024 in a Post-Policy World, with Tom Nichols
Переглядів 240Місяць тому
Tom Nichols, staff writer at "The Atlantic" and professor emeritus at U.S. Naval War College, returns to "The Doorstep" in its penultimate episode to discuss the lead-up to the 2024 U.S. presidential election with co-hosts Nick Gvosdev and Tatiana Serafin. Will upcoming nominating conventions and presidential debates make a difference or have voters already made up their minds? How can the yout...
The Doorstep: The Continuing Exploitation of the Global Sugar Trade, with Megha Rajagopalan
Переглядів 105Місяць тому
In collaboration with Marymount Manhattan College and their Social Justice Academy: Labor, Work, Action, Doorstep co-host Tatiana Serafin speaks with New York Times investigative reporter Megha Rajagopalan about human rights abuses in the global sugar trade and the challenges of holding governments and corporations accountable. For more, please go to: carnegiecouncil.co/doorstep-rajagopalan #et...
Derek Reveron: Should the U.S. Government Ban TikTok?
Переглядів 69Місяць тому
U.S. Naval War College's Derek Reveron discusses the pros and cons of the U.S. government's proposed ban on TikTok, highlighting several potential national security concerns. For more, please go to: carnegiecouncil.co/doorstep-reveron-savage #ethics #internationalaffairs #cybersecurity #tiktok
John Savage: Digital Sovereignty & Responding to Cyberattacks
Переглядів 55Місяць тому
Brown University's John Savage says that digitally sovereign nations have the right to respond to violations of their cyberspace, an issue that needs to be discussed, he says, in light of threats from Russia, Iran, and North Korea. For more, please go to: carnegiecouncil.co/doorstep-reveron-savage #ethics #internationalaffairs #cybersecurity
The Doorstep: Protecting Cyberspace, with Derek Reveron and John Savage
Переглядів 802 місяці тому
In today’s digitized world, our lives inexorably intertwine with cyberspace. We are exposed to damaging cyberattacks by foreign actors, local criminal gangs, and other nefarious entities. U.S. Naval War College’s Derek Reveron and Brown University’s John E. Savage join "Doorstep" co-hosts Nick Gvosdev and Tatiana Serafin to discuss their new book "Security in the Cyber Age" and how we can prote...
Emily Tripp: Human Rights & Moral Injury in Conflict Zones
Переглядів 822 місяці тому
Airwars' Emily Tripp discusses the need to speak about human rights in conflict zones beyond the legal frameworks, to discuss what "moral injury" and civilian harm look like for both the affected communities and the militaries. For more from this talk, please go to: carnegiecouncil.co/humanization-warfare #ethics #internationalaffairs #humanrights
Adil Haque: How can courts work to protect international humanitarian law?
Переглядів 602 місяці тому
Rutger Law School's Adil Haque discusses the different ways that international courts interpret laws protecting human rights, touching on the work of the Geneva Conventions and the Additional Protocols. For more from this talk, please go to: carnegiecouncil.co/humanization-warfare #ethics #internationalaffairs #humanrights
Ashley Deeks: What is the U.S. doing to reduce civilian harm in conflicts?
Переглядів 862 місяці тому
University of Virginia School of Law's Ashley Deeks discusses what the White House, Congress, the Department of Defense, and NGOs are doing to address the issue of civilian harm in conflicts, including a new academic center and a memorandum. For more from this talk, please go to: carnegiecouncil.co/humanization-warfare #ethics #internationalaffairs #humanrights
The Ubiquity of An Aging Global Elite, with Jon Emont
Переглядів 3012 місяці тому
Today, eight of the world's most populous countries, or about 4 billion people, are led by politicians 70 years of age or older. "Wall Street Journal" reporter Jon Emont joins "Doorstep" co-hosts Nick Gvosdev and Tatiana Serafin to discuss the systems and structures that keep aging leaders in power in both autocracies and democracies. What do we lose when generational change is stifled? Can the...
Admiral James Stavridis: Can the U.S. "Pivot" to the Pacific?
Переглядів 1002 місяці тому
Admiral James Stavridis, former supreme allied commander of NATO, says that the U.S., as it's currently configured, has not developed a "coherent national strategy" for engaging with East and South Asia and could look to China for an example of future planning. For more on this talk, please go to: carnegiecouncil.co/doorstep-2054 #ethics #internationalaffairs #foreignpolicy
Unlocking Cooperation: The Global South and Global North
Переглядів 9042 місяці тому
How can Global South and Global North nations collaborate more effectively? What roadblocks hinder joint action on crucial issues such as security, development, climate, and AI? How can ethical reflection and engagement pave the way for a more inclusive and equitable multilateralism? In the inaugural panel of Carnegie Council’s “Unlocking Cooperation” series, moderator Ramu Damodaran discusses ...
The Humanization of Warfare: Ethics, Law, and Civilians in Conflict
Переглядів 1732 місяці тому
The Humanization of Warfare: Ethics, Law, and Civilians in Conflict
2054, with Elliot Ackerman and Admiral James Stavridis
Переглядів 3233 місяці тому
2054, with Elliot Ackerman and Admiral James Stavridis
The Doorstep: Culture as an Antidote to Authoritarianism, with Suzanne Nossel
Переглядів 1223 місяці тому
The Doorstep: Culture as an Antidote to Authoritarianism, with Suzanne Nossel
A Carnegie Council Conversation with the UK Home Secretary
Переглядів 1193 місяці тому
A Carnegie Council Conversation with the UK Home Secretary
The Doorstep: Ukraine at the Crossroads, with Maria Popova & Oxana Shevel
Переглядів 1794 місяці тому
The Doorstep: Ukraine at the Crossroads, with Maria Popova & Oxana Shevel
The Doorstep: How an Unreliable United States Destabilizes the Globe, with Nahal Toosi
Переглядів 964 місяці тому
The Doorstep: How an Unreliable United States Destabilizes the Globe, with Nahal Toosi
Charles W. Kegley, Jr. Lecture Series: A Place for Ethics in World Politics
Переглядів 2414 місяці тому
Charles W. Kegley, Jr. Lecture Series: A Place for Ethics in World Politics
Mapping the Impact of Data Fusion on Freedom, Security, and Human Rights
Переглядів 6084 місяці тому
Mapping the Impact of Data Fusion on Freedom, Security, and Human Rights
Global Justice in a Turbulent World
Переглядів 474 місяці тому
Global Justice in a Turbulent World
Human Rights, Security, & the Helsinki Legacy: A Discussion with Peter Osnos
Переглядів 854 місяці тому
Human Rights, Security, & the Helsinki Legacy: A Discussion with Peter Osnos
The Future of Foreign Policy is Feminist, with Kristina Lunz
Переглядів 2054 місяці тому
The Future of Foreign Policy is Feminist, with Kristina Lunz
When Science Meets Power, with Geoff Mulgan
Переглядів 1635 місяців тому
When Science Meets Power, with Geoff Mulgan
Judah Grunstein: Global Conflicts Don't Take Shape Overnight
Переглядів 465 місяців тому
Judah Grunstein: Global Conflicts Don't Take Shape Overnight
Imagining Success in a Post-Quantum Future
Переглядів 585 місяців тому
Imagining Success in a Post-Quantum Future
The Doorstep: Can the Nation-State Survive in 2024? with Judah Grunstein
Переглядів 1385 місяців тому
The Doorstep: Can the Nation-State Survive in 2024? with Judah Grunstein
C2GTalk: Why does the world now need to consider SRM? with Kim Stanley Robinson
Переглядів 1205 місяців тому
C2GTalk: Why does the world now need to consider SRM? with Kim Stanley Robinson
C2GTalk: Why is it important to uphold ethics in the research on SRM? with Gabriela Ramos
Переглядів 416 місяців тому
C2GTalk: Why is it important to uphold ethics in the research on SRM? with Gabriela Ramos

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @user-vr6io5xb9e
    @user-vr6io5xb9e День тому

    Oy vey

  • @SunshineCoastRealEstate
    @SunshineCoastRealEstate 3 дні тому

    For those 'useful idiots' who still believe that there was a coup in Turkiye in 2016, then consider this:: - in the following 48 hours, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of people were arrested for being part of the plot. Now there is NO WAY Turkish Intelligence could assemble a list like that in anything less than SIX MONTHS. So that list was pre-prepared. One fun fact is that there were people who were to be arrested post-coup who had DIED months before! - any high-ranking military, police, judicial, academic, and public servants who were deemed a 'threat' to Erdogan's power then or in the future were thus arrested in that post coup witch hunt. - is it a coincidence that this supposed coup attempt was then used by Erdogan to give himself even more DICTATORIAL powers? - every other coup in Turkiye's history was staged on a late Sunday night/early hours of Monday morning, so that there would be minimal or no disruption to everyday life. People would just wake up on Monday morning to a new situation. Yet in 2016 the 'plotters' staged their coup on a Friday night during peak hour in Istanbul to cause maximum disruption, and thus convince ordinary Turks to hate the 'plotters' for the inconvenience. - every other coup in Turkiye's history had the military seize the leader of the country at those times as their number one priority. Yet as David notes, in 2016 they seemed to have forgotten how to do that properly! The 'coup' of 2016 was a False Flag event, designed to give the Dictator more power, and he made sure he got it. That power has since been used to not only to silence/jail/kill his political enemies and investigative journalists, but also has been used to enrich his (donor) benefactors in the construction industry with his direct interference in the Central bank and its decisions. Meanwhile, the 'cheap' money which then flowed into constructing Mosques no one wanted, another international airport in Istanbul that no one wanted, and condominiums and apartment skyscrapers that no one wanted (in a city that's just waiting for the 'big one' earthquake) has been great for the wealthy backers of Erdogan - for the other 90% of Turkiye's population, not so much. Turkish working class people can't afford rent, bread, or the basics of life. Turkiye is on its knees. And thanks to the last rigged/corrupt election, will remain so until the Turkish people rise up in a REAL coup d'état.

  • @tinalefauve3698
    @tinalefauve3698 4 дні тому

    So many things to like here. The framing of human error in dangerous conditions strikes me as useful in daily life as well as wonky technical management systems (ISO9000, etc). This would have been a powerful example when I was working with managers and engineers to systemically reduce waste/risk. Dr. Edward Deming said : "without theory we are lost" and I appreciate how your book aligns with The Profound Knowledge Of Systems. Deming said that as well. One last Deming quip I I used while problem solving, that think you'll like "if people didn't make mistakes, there would be no mistakes".

  • @user-we9kl5mk4g
    @user-we9kl5mk4g 7 днів тому

    ALLOWING SERBIA INTO THE E.U. IS THE END OF EUROPE. PUTIN WILL NEVER TURN TO NUCLEAR WAR. HE HAS PLANS A, B, C, D. GETTING SERBIA INTO E.U. VIA ORBAN'S BIG MOUTH IS PLAN C. BYE-BYE E.U. IF YOU ALLOW SERBIA ENTRY.

  • @andrewpirr
    @andrewpirr 7 днів тому

    @10:10 I'm shocked that the CIA influenced PEN! How are you sure they aren't able to influence PEN today??

  • @Impericalevidence
    @Impericalevidence 9 днів тому

    ABC, easy as one two three... Don't be evil abc.

  • @farhanrizkiahnafa7404
    @farhanrizkiahnafa7404 9 днів тому

    Pretty sure Garry have yet to see the wrath of Global South 😂

  • @BK-uf6qr
    @BK-uf6qr 12 днів тому

    I dislike presentations like this. They’re ubiquitous. They dwell on the negative. Kissinger is a worthy punching bag for these type of people. All they see is mistakes by some people while ignoring others. Nixon and Kissinger got this war after 2 presidents and many deployments. The U.S. position in the world can’t be bought. Our enemies are much like these presenters. They criticize and attack whatever they can, when they can. I’m sure Nixon and Kissinger didn’t want the war. They did t ask for it. Once in it they had to deal with it. It would be easy for any politician to stop what others started. To walk out and leave the south Vietnamese to die. It’s ironic that in today’s world we fret over the weak the helpless. We don’t want them to be butchered. Nixon wanted the South to take over and fight for themselves. But congress cut the funding. The message is we shouldn’t have even tried to save south Vietnam. We should have sent them some money and once they were over ran, cut them lose. Who’s next?

  • @envoyofthecross
    @envoyofthecross 13 днів тому

    Trend trend trend trend! Chr*st is KING

  • @manuelabrandle9843
    @manuelabrandle9843 13 днів тому

    Nato ist eine Kriminelle Angriffsorganisation gegründet von USA . Nato gehört sofort zerschlagen da sie selber gegen ihre Bestimmung(Schutz vor Angriffen) agiert...sie greift unprovoziert andere Länder an ...ist also eine Terror Organisation und gehört ausgerottet.

  • @zattut
    @zattut 14 днів тому

    Muslim women wear hijab just like Mary the mother of Jesus. Mary has such high value in the Cora'n. I like how he said that she was not wearing the hijab, and she quickly americanized.

  • @sonderman8079
    @sonderman8079 17 днів тому

    How does the same question apply to USA and Israel today?

  • @209Richsta
    @209Richsta 17 днів тому

    Might have something to do with Sadaam Husseisn funding the Muslim Brotherhood of Syria in the 80s....

  • @Muzikman127
    @Muzikman127 18 днів тому

    Short clip, 9 years old, under 1000 views, and a lot of wisdom contained in it! Succinct and articulate summary of the significant problems underlying US foreign relations

  • @gladghuru
    @gladghuru 19 днів тому

    Liberal Democracy and inexcusable negligence in hiring, firing, wilful misrepresentation in the service of inexcusable wilful cover-up with said determination rules defined by government, where any kind of proven neglience with regard to all inacceptable degrees of compliance with govermental anti-explotation measures mandated by goverment, including excusable negligence with regard to governmentally defined anti-exploitation thresholds, failure to investiate claims of inexcusaable irrational refusal to monitor and publish success and failure trends in regard to that national govermental dictat, especially in regard to mandated minimum quality standards.

  • @calicocat8213
    @calicocat8213 20 днів тому

    So, by 1943 the United States of Avarice had already known they'd release Japanese wartime militarists and actual war criminals by 1948 and, instead of having them face trials for Crimes Against Humanity, pamper, groom and finance (bribe) them into establishing the LDP, a political party in power practically uninterruptedly since 1955.

  • @alexleanh
    @alexleanh 21 день тому

    Ho Chi Minh said: "They are invaders... and like all invaders before them (the Chinese, the French, the Japanese)... they all eventually have to leave and go home..." I don't care what American politicians and generals say about the Vietnam War with their errors and mistakes in tactics and strategies... because: Firstly, it's irrelevant nowadays... Secondly, it's irrelevant because they did not learn their lessons and keep making the same mistakes again in Iraq and Afghanistan. Thousands and thousands books and millions and millions pages have written about the causes of failure in the Vietnam War... but... Iraq and Afghanistan still happened! The ONLY way the US can win in these kinds of wars is to... NEVER leave. Case in point: Japan, South Korea, Germany. Hundreds thousands of US troops have stationed permanently on hundreds of military bases on these three nations... hence, the current situation as a win. Otherwise... just another Vietnam.

  • @user-cs5bn6tu1f
    @user-cs5bn6tu1f 21 день тому

    This habit to lying is not part of the problem is the problem. However, understanding this event requires examining the formative influence of the US Invasion of Iraq (2003), which ended with the Islamic State taking power in Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS). An indirect link to the US Invasion of Iraq and ISIS is debatable. However, telling that russian enemy was Syria and only the USA fighting the ISIS is ridiculous.

  • @dijachanel9994
    @dijachanel9994 22 дні тому

    All prophets were a model to follow by that when Prophet Mohamed instructed via the Quran his wives when talking to his companions and followers it should be behind a veil it’s a lesson for us to follow

  • @dijachanel9994
    @dijachanel9994 22 дні тому

    Having many wives isn’t unconditional but the man has to seek being just with all his wives which God knows that we can’t be especially within the heart of man certainly he would have a preference to one of his wives for that reason God mentioned marry only one, also if you think it’s a solution to the surplus of women in many societies or in time of wars or epidemic circumstances instead of having concubines

  • @christopherarmstrong2710
    @christopherarmstrong2710 24 дні тому

    3:34 High standards are invigorating

  • @ellekewilms6891
    @ellekewilms6891 25 днів тому

    Mr. Putin’s performance is full of mistakes, according to mr. Freeman. I would like him to list them.

  • @sergm7195
    @sergm7195 27 днів тому

    This is definitely the most narrow-minded, conceited, self-important CIA shmuck I have seen in the recent years (of my work in KGB) 😂

  • @sevvalsimsek3191
    @sevvalsimsek3191 27 днів тому

    Peter singer mükemmel birisi düşünceleri harika etkilendiğimi itiraf etmeliyim 🥹

  • @jeviosoorishas181
    @jeviosoorishas181 27 днів тому

    Lol at the comments, people really don't know how to follow an argument anymore, they just react to facts, as though they're isolated from one another. First argument Bernard makes: In the west: the State and the Church are two SEPARATE institutions. Second argument Bernard makes: The Church is a building and an institution with ITS OWN LAWS, CUSTOMS, OWN HISTORY AND PERSONNEL. (as in Independent of the State) Third argument, based on the first two: the Mosque is not an institution. The Mosque is a PART of Islam: it's a building that has Islamic Laws, Rules, Customs etc. He literally says before he makes that point "IN THAT SENSE..." referring to his two previous arguments. People are responding that he's ignorant and that he doesn't know what he's talking about, when they literally prove within their points that he is indeed correct. Islam from its birth had legal backing and state power behind it, whereas the Church didn't in the West, which is why it developed separately from it. The Mosque doesn't exist independent of Islam, but exists because of it. Muhammad did not develop Islam in opposition to the state, rather Muhammad gained power and then became the state 😂, and that's what's been passed down since.

  • @Cosmo7743
    @Cosmo7743 28 днів тому

    Нанесение ВСУ ударов западным оружием по территории России не втянет Запад в прямое военное столкновение с Москвой. Ты несёшь чушь.

  • @georgesaakyants9080
    @georgesaakyants9080 29 днів тому

    This self-impressed dude does not seem to be aware that his so called "liberal democracy" that US is supposed to be the classic example of is worse of a monster than what he calls illiberal democracy. In Hungary, Turkey, Russia, China the level of disfunction in press, judicial and university is way less than in US today. What free MSM outlet can one name in US - CNN? What free judicial system is it that is hunting down political opponents, like Biden's judge bulldogs do on Trump (who is not a likable character either, but here he is the oppressed no doubt)? What freedom is there in the woke-stricken leftist university system? It is amazing how Mr. Professor got it all wrong. Human nature is what it is no matter what you call it - liberal or illiberal. The men (and chimps) at power tend to screw the people (chimps) underneath to the degree to which the people let them. And in the liberal west people are so zombified these days that they let their Tiran's get away with a lot. It is time you wake up America!

  • @friedricengravy6646
    @friedricengravy6646 29 днів тому

    This didnt age well lol. Trump turned out to b even worse than the critics expected.

  • @PravdaSeed
    @PravdaSeed Місяць тому

    🧞 why he doesn't Mention FM-30 & Jason jorjani ⁉️ Everything he is trying to say done Years ago.

  • @brian78045
    @brian78045 Місяць тому

    (1) The World War I Allies conspire to not mine the Danish Straits, such mining allowing the Allies to control the Baltic Sea, which means the British and Russian navies can hook up, allowing troop landings all across the Baltic coastlines, resulting in Germany being knocked out of the war before the war begins; the mining of the Danish Straits checkmates Germany. However, Germany is allowed to mine the Danish Straits, knowing their critical importance to her entry into the looming war. Germany also bullies Denmark into placing mines in the straits. Once Germany moves on the straits, Britain and Russia conspire to not use their minesweepers to remove the mines! Why isn't this in our history books? Why didn't the press of the day sound the alarm about the critical importance of controlling the Danish Straits? Where were the calls for inquiries into the Danish Straits fiasco that allowed World War I to take place? (2) The World War I Allies conspired to not deploy the 50,000 strong Czech Legion to oust Lenin & Bolsheviks in Saint Petersburg. The Check Legion was encamped southeast of Kiev, 600 miles south of Saint Petersburg, but instead of sending the legion 600 miles north to destroy Lenin & Bolsheviks, the Allies send the legion 6,000 miles across Russia to Vladivostok for evacuation, thereby allowing the redeployment of one-million German soldiers from the Russian Eastern Front to the Western Front! Why would the Allies want Russia out of the war, knowing they would now probably lose the war with the arrival on the Western Front of one-million German soldiers? Who told the Bolshevik Central Committee that it was safe to go ahead with the Kerensky coup, allaying their fears that the Allies had no intention of easily destroying the Bolsheviks? Why didn't the press call for inquiries into the Czech Legion fiasco?

  • @kimsteinke713
    @kimsteinke713 Місяць тому

    It's only Republicans that have been trying to take LGBT rights away and where there's oppression in one you'll find it all. The GOP is corrupt and now it's a cult so is Donald Trump a cult it's hate mega hate Don't follow it.

  • @bhhvvbvgyvbuvv
    @bhhvvbvgyvbuvv Місяць тому

    Is this the part of youtube where one can argue with his peers in peace ?

  • @bhhvvbvgyvbuvv
    @bhhvvbvgyvbuvv Місяць тому

    NO . Censorship is never justified. Even if its the kkk. That man has a right to hate you and express his hatred for you. You do not have to like it or agree. You dont even have to listen/read. Theres alot of things you will disagree with in your life. Facing those things and choosing to go another route builds character. A healthy debate can open you up to new ideas you would never have considered otherwise. So what if youre upset. Our ancestors died in the thousands to help make sure you had that right to express your opinion whatever it may be as long as it does not impede the life or rights of your fellow citizen.

  • @MyMediterranean1
    @MyMediterranean1 Місяць тому

    Everyone knows Salah Uddeen was a Kurd how you say people don’t know??!!?😡

  • @katzewuff1553
    @katzewuff1553 Місяць тому

    Kristina Lunz is financed by the Gates Foundation. Not very feminist, is it??

  • @freebeerfordworkers
    @freebeerfordworkers Місяць тому

    He never takes into account that mass immigration has wiped out the surplus housing and education capacity Britain's had and bringing in millions from the third world has stressed our health services to breaking point. I met a senior retired naval officer at a function and he said the problem with politicians to day was they had never done anything in their lives apart from politics. They come with up with an idea then tell the executive to get on with it without the any thought of the resources needed or actual implications beyond their righteous fantasies. It's thanks to idiots like him that a certain minority was gang raping British children for years and the best solution our government could have come up with was say it wasn't a problem - they liked it

  • @JohnBdog
    @JohnBdog Місяць тому

    One example would have been helpful. All theory and conjecture.

  • @72marshflower15
    @72marshflower15 Місяць тому

    Nice propaganda

  • @TopDingoMan
    @TopDingoMan Місяць тому

    Inclusive??? Please explain these verses: A Kafir (Non believer) can be plotted against- Koran 86:15 They plot and scheme against you [Mohammed], and I plot and scheme against them. Therefore, deal calmly with the Kafirs and leave them alone for a while. A Kafir can be terrorized- Koran 8:12 Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the Kafirs’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!” A Muslim is not the friend of a Kafir- Koran 3:28 Believers should not take Kafirs as friends in preference to other believers. Those who do this will have none of Allah’s protection and will only have themselves as guards. Allah warns you to fear Him for all will return to Him. A Kafir is cursed- Koran 33:61 They [Kafirs] will be cursed, and wherever they are found, they will be seized and murdered. It was Allah’s same practice with those who came before them, and you will find no change in Allah’s ways

  • @BurntPuff
    @BurntPuff Місяць тому

    A nurse says this patient had this vaccine and developed a lot of pain and redness in the injection site that took a week to go away! It was so bad that Im going to report it as a serious reaction and need the regulatory agency to tell me if we can give a second dose! Well, her empathy resulted in irrational judgement which clogs up the reporting system with an already known non-serious report. Do you really think that is as serious as someone that had died??

  • @SilatLalli
    @SilatLalli Місяць тому

    Professor is a breath of fresh air but is also misinformed about many Islamic teachings.

  • @henrythomson6097
    @henrythomson6097 Місяць тому

    that’s my dad

  • @James-kj4cy
    @James-kj4cy Місяць тому

    How do you have a two state solution when one is democratic and the other either autocratic or theocratic!

    • @thebenevolentsun6575
      @thebenevolentsun6575 Місяць тому

      It's not just the state that is affected. The civilians who live in Palestine have a right to carry on living in the homes their families were born and raised in. Palestine has been majority Arab-muslim since 600AD, about as long as England has been English-Christian. Britain was pressured by America to allow Jewish migrants to settle in Palestine. What did the Zionists do? The began bombing British buildings because they wouldn't allow the Jews to displace the Arab population. Eventually the Zionist terrorists did so much damage that Britain divided Palestine into Palestine and Israel. Were the Israelis happy with that? No they invaded the remaining Palestinian territory and displaced even more Arabs. There are autocratic/theocratic states everywhere. How can you say your problem is with the government of Palestine and then allow the bombing and displacement of its civilians? What Hamas are doing now is EXACTLY what the Zionists did in British Palestine.

    • @josephkennedy4091
      @josephkennedy4091 Місяць тому

      You don't

  • @DM-eo6zw
    @DM-eo6zw Місяць тому

    Jared Cohen, the guy who single-handedly introduced the US State Department to the technology that brings down democratically elected governments to be replaced by US Approved “Puppet” governments. So successful, that he is now leading Goldman Sachs in their State Department guided insider investments division.

  • @Christmas12
    @Christmas12 Місяць тому

    Apparently he didn't hear about Israel - they don't even have a proper constitution so it all comes down to the judicial changes the right wing were about to ram through - they probably will now after their genocide in Gaza - and I hope they do, the world should understand fully how evil the Zionist state is

  • @Hassan_Rajput_PAS
    @Hassan_Rajput_PAS Місяць тому

    First, Kant proposed the creation of a rational Republican state, responsive to a representative assembly and constitutionalism, to reduce the likelihood of unnecessary wars. Second, he suggested a formal pledge among these states to live at peace and respect individual rights, creating a credible legal commitment. Lastly, Kant believed in the importance of increasing contact between nations through trade, tourism, and other exchanges, fostering a cosmopolitan order and recognizing common humanity. These three elements, according to Doyle, would establish a reliable basis for peace among these Republican states, although not a definitive solution to the problem of war.

  • @Hassan_Rajput_PAS
    @Hassan_Rajput_PAS Місяць тому

    3 According to Doyle, Kant believed that states should act morally and rationally, and that they would eventually form a "perpetual peace" through a "federation of free states." This federation would be based on a shared commitment to respecting the sovereignty and freedom of all member states. Doyle explains that Kant's ideas have influenced modern international relations theory, particularly in the areas of international law and the concept of a "cosmopolitan society."

  • @Hassan_Rajput_PAS
    @Hassan_Rajput_PAS Місяць тому

    World Government is difficult but also tyrannical, due to separate identities and ruling across very long distances 0:30 World government is neither desirable nor possible 1:33 3 conditions to perpetual peace republicans government- representatives, separation of power, deliberations. 5:17 2 - a credible legal pledge, ideological and moral, recognizes free citizens rights of fellow liberal states respect each other 6:32 3 - cosmopolitan order trade, exchange of ideas, intellectual share, economic relations

  • @kyotosinfinity5959
    @kyotosinfinity5959 Місяць тому

    Open University

  • @janklaas6885
    @janklaas6885 Місяць тому

    📍44:11